Skip to content

Critical Mass Banana vs Optimum Nutrition Serious Mass Banana

Side-by-side comparison of scores, ingredients, prices and real customer feedback for Critical Mass Banana and Optimum Nutrition Serious Mass Banana.

Last verified: 19 Feb 2026 · Based on 8 reviews

Our Verdict: Critical Mass Banana or Optimum Nutrition Serious Mass Banana?

Applied Nutrition Critical Mass wins with an 80/100 score versus Optimum Nutrition's 70/100, backed by superior ingredient quality and faster reported results. Choose Serious Mass if you need maximum calories per serving — its 1,250 kcal dwarfs Critical Mass — but be mindful of the higher sugar content.

— AIScored Editorial Team

80.0
Score Summary

Critical Mass Banana scores 80.0/100 vs Optimum Nutrition Serious Mass Banana at 70.0/100. Critical Mass Banana wins on effectiveness, ingredient quality, side effects.

Critical Mass Banana vs Optimum Nutrition Serious Mass Banana: What Does the Data Say?

Both products sit at £40, but Applied Nutrition's Critical Mass edges ahead with a score of 80/100 compared to Optimum Nutrition's Serious Mass at 70/100 — and the gap is most notable in effectiveness (90 versus 80) and ingredient quality (80 versus 70). The Critical Mass delivers over 1,000 calories per serving and users report visible strength and size gains within two to four weeks, suggesting the formula is well-calibrated for lean mass rather than indiscriminate bulk. Serious Mass hits 1,250 calories per serving, which is more aggressive, but also comes with 12g of sugar per serving — something worth factoring in if you're mindful of overall diet quality.

If you train hard and consistently, Applied Nutrition is the better pick. The higher effectiveness score reflects real-world results, and the leaner calorie profile means less risk of unwanted fat if your sessions are intense. Serious Mass suits someone who genuinely struggles to eat enough and needs every calorie they can get — the extra 250 calories per serving adds up meaningfully over time.

On taste, both are banana flavoured and both receive strong feedback in that regard. Applied Nutrition comes in at 2.4kg versus Serious Mass at 2.73kg for the same price, so you get slightly fewer servings — but given the scores, the quality difference likely justifies that.

How Do the Scores Compare?

Critical Mass Professional ...
Serious Mass Banana 2.73kg
Critical Mass Professional Lean Mass Gainer Banana 2.4kg (16 Servings)
Critical Mass Professional ...
Applied Nutrition
Serious Mass Banana 2.73kg
Serious Mass Banana 2.73kg
Optimum Nutrition
Overall Score 80.0 70.0
Effectiveness 90.0/100
Best
80.0/100
Ingredient Quality 80.0/100
Best
70.0/100
Value for Money 80.0/100
Best
80.0/100
Best
Side Effects 80.0/100
Best
70.0/100
Certifications 80.0/100
Best
30.0/100
Best Price £40.00 Holland & Barrett → £36.00 Holland & Barrett →
Cheapest
Form None powder
Dose None None
Third-Party Tested ✗ No ✗ No
Reviews Analysed 4 4

Critical Mass Professional Lean ...

Pros

  • Rapid results: Users report visible muscle gain and strength increases within 2-4 weeks
  • Strong, enjoyable flavor that encourages consistent use
  • High caloric density (1,000+ calories) supports the caloric surplus needed for lean mass gain
  • Informed Sport registered and Halal certified—meets testing and dietary standards

Cons

  • Very high calorie content may lead to excess fat gain if training stimulus is insufficient
  • Strong flavor (per reviews) may be overwhelming for some users even at reduced portions
  • Not third-party tested beyond Informed Sport registration; lacks independent lab verification
  • High sugar content in standard formulation (though 'reduced sugar' variant exists); not suitable for strict carb-controlled diets

Best For

Hard gainers and ectomorphs seeking rapid lean mass and strength Athletes in high-volume training phases requiring caloric surplus Individuals prioritizing convenience and taste over minimal processing Users following halal dietary requirements
View full review →

Serious Mass Banana 2.73kg

Pros

  • Excellent taste (specifically noted as 'tasty' and 'marvellous')
  • High calorie density (1,250 kcal per serving) efficiently supports weight gain goals
  • Substantial protein content (50g per serving) supports muscle building and repair
  • Good value for money at current pricing

Cons

  • Very high sugar content (12g per serving) may be concerning for some users
  • Not third-party tested or certified
  • High sodium per serving (1.48g salt) may be problematic for sodium-sensitive individuals
  • Contains multiple allergens (milk, soy, gluten possible) limiting suitability for those with common allergies

Best For

Hard-gainers seeking rapid calorie and protein intake Athletes with high metabolic demands Individuals needing convenient meal replacement Older adults (71+ demonstrated long-term use satisfaction) Those prioritizing taste and palatability
View full review →

Score Breakdown: Critical Mass Banana vs Optimum Nutrition Serious Mass Banana

Critical Mass Banana Winner 80.0/100

Applied Nutrition Critical Mass Professional is a high-calorie lean mass gainer (1,000+ calories per serving) designed for hard gainers and athletes seeking rapid weight gain.

Effectiveness
Critical Mass Pr..
90.0/100
Serious Mass Ban..
80.0/100
Ingredient Quality
Critical Mass Pr..
80.0/100
Serious Mass Ban..
70.0/100
Value for Money
Critical Mass Pr..
80.0/100
Serious Mass Ban..
80.0/100
Side Effects
Critical Mass Pr..
80.0/100
Serious Mass Ban..
70.0/100
Certifications
Critical Mass Pr..
80.0/100
Serious Mass Ban..
30.0/100

What are the key differences?

Critical Mass Banana is best for: Hard gainers and ectomorphs seeking rapid lean mass and strength, Athletes in high-volume training phases requiring caloric surplus
Optimum Nutrition Serious Mass Banana is best for: Hard-gainers seeking rapid calorie and protein intake, Athletes with high metabolic demands

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Critical Mass Banana or Optimum Nutrition Serious Mass Banana?
Applied Nutrition Critical Mass wins with an 80/100 score versus Optimum Nutrition's 70/100, backed by superior ingredient quality and faster reported results. Choose Serious Mass if you need maximum calories per serving — its 1,250 kcal dwarfs Critical Mass — but be mindful of the higher sugar content. Critical Mass Banana scores 80.0/100 overall while Optimum Nutrition Serious Mass Banana scores 70.0/100. Critical Mass Banana comes out ahead, scoring higher on effectiveness (90.0 vs 80.0). Critical Mass Banana is best suited for Hard gainers and ectomorphs seeking rapid lean mass and strength and Athletes in high-volume training phases requiring caloric surplus. Optimum Nutrition Serious Mass Banana is better for Hard-gainers seeking rapid calorie and protein intake and Athletes with high metabolic demands.
Is Critical Mass Banana worth the price compared to Optimum Nutrition Serious Mass Banana?
Critical Mass Banana costs £40.00 while Optimum Nutrition Serious Mass Banana is £36.00. For value, Critical Mass Banana scores 80.0/100 vs Optimum Nutrition Serious Mass Banana's 80.0/100. Both offer similar value for money.
Which has fewer side effects?
Critical Mass Banana scores 80.0/100 for side effects (higher means fewer reported issues) while Optimum Nutrition Serious Mass Banana scores 70.0/100. Reviewers report fewer side effects with Critical Mass Banana. For certification and testing, Critical Mass Banana scores 80.0/100 vs Optimum Nutrition Serious Mass Banana's 30.0/100. Always consult a healthcare professional before starting any supplement.

Related Product Comparisons

Disclaimer: AIScored provides data-driven comparisons based on publicly available reviews. This is not medical advice. Affiliate links may earn us a commission at no extra cost to you.

Feedback & Suggestions

Spotted an issue? Wrong price, incorrect data, or something else off? Let us know and we'll fix it.

Missing a product you'd like us to review? Tell us the product name and we'll consider adding it.