Felix Kitten As Good As It Looks Chicken vs Felix Kitten As Good As It Looks Salmon

Pros

• ✓Excellent palatability — kittens consistently clean bowls; widely accepted even by fussy eaters
• ✓Formulated specifically for growth stage with appropriate protein, fat, and taurine levels
• ✓High moisture jelly format supports urinary tract health and hydration in young kittens
• ✓Very competitive price per pouch with reliable UK-wide availability

Cons

• ✗Uses vague 'meat and animal derivatives' rather than named, high-percentage chicken — ingredient quality and consistency is not guaranteed
• ✗Multiple owners note an excess of jelly relative to meat per pouch, reducing effective protein density per serving
• ✗Low ingredient transparency makes independent assessment of protein source quality difficult
• ✗Not well-suited as a long-term sole diet for kittens that would benefit from higher named-meat content

Best For

Pros

• ✓Very high palatability — cats and kittens consistently accept it well, even fussy or stray cats
• ✓High moisture content (jelly format) supports hydration and urinary tract health
• ✓Formulated specifically for kittens — meets FEDIAF growth-stage nutritional requirements
• ✓Taurine added — essential for feline heart and eye health

Cons

• ✗Heavy use of 'meat and animal derivatives' — non-specific protein source, low transparency
• ✗Named salmon content is minimal (~4%), misleading relative to the product name
• ✗Jelly ratio reported as high relative to actual meat/fish pieces
• ✗Not suitable as a sole long-term diet for kittens with sensitive digestion or specific protein allergies due to undisclosed meat sources

Best For